 |
| How Libtards see Mandela |
By Mike Smith
22nd of February 2020
After Pink Frikkie and his foundation this past week set the cat amongst the pigeons with their statements that Apartheid was not a crime against humanity and nothing but Soviet-era agitprop, it caused a collective Leftist belly-ache-and-gripe from the few blinkered libtards left over in the country.
As could be expected, jellyfish Frikkie folded and issued a retraction and an apology after only three days on the 17th of February, confirming what we already knew about the character of this weakling idiot and traitor who sold us out and handed our country over (unconditionally) to a bunch of Marxist terrorists.
Of course, the Leftist media and academia would not let go so quickly, so they went and lifted every fungus-covered rock in the stinking swamp of Leftiststania to see if there were still some reptiles lurking there that could prop up their bullshit weak arguments and cases against the Frikkie Foundation.
Oh, boy…and did they come slithering out…Antjie Krog, Lindie Koorts, Ferial Haffajee, Melanie Verwoerd, her limp-wristed ex husband, Prof Willem Verwoerd, his colleague at the Boere Oxford, Prof Anton van Niekerk (former minister) Leon Wessels and of course eloquent-wannabee, Richard Poplak …and I think that was about it…
…The last residual “bittereinder verligtes”...the ones not wanted anywhere in the world due to a lack of intelligence. The scrapesels at the bottom of the barrel. The hippies of the bygone era when South Africa was still a jewel on a dark continent before these oh so “enlightened” leftist idiots helped made it into the Utopia of crime and corruption they enjoy today.
According to Krog, De Klerk and us should collectively fall on our knees and beg for forgiveness from our majority citizens for the wrongs of Apartheid…however no such request for the ANC to collectively apologize for their victims of necklaces, bombs in shopping malls and tortures of their own people in their camps like Quatro.
Antjie Krog: FW de Klerk never had any moral intention, and he left us behind as white kansvatters
What some people do not know is that Prof Antjie Krog (UWC) holds an Honorary Doctorate from that world leading propaganda machine, the Tavistock Clinic of the University of East London UK. She was awarded this for her lifelong and racist anti-white propaganda against her own people of South Africa. About the only good question she ever asked was in one of her plays, “Why are the ones who toyi-toyi in the front always fat?”
Not sure what she meant by that and if it showed her petulant prejudice towards fat people, but I must admit that at 67 years old she is not exactly the paragon of a Lotto-prize anymore and her post-menopausal form rather resembles a derelict frigate than that of a sleek sloop and it is clear that the few scattered bits of grey matter left in her skull is already past dementia and starting to show signs of Alzheimers, because thirty years ago she was one of the libtards who praised De Klerk for releasing the Dead Terrorist and unbanning his Marxist ANC. Now she turns against him.
Adding his sissy voice to the libtard chorus was the comical professor Anton van Niekerk who was once filled in by (now deceased) Abel Malan, a former businessman and lieutenant in the Paratroopers, for insulting those who served on the border. Prof Van Niekerk also screamed like a tortured bush-pig when a student called Lodi Gouws entered his class wearing a G-string and shot him with a water pistol. You can read what I wrote about him here:
Lippy Liberal Afrikaner Prof. Anton van Niekerk meets his match
The Abel Malan saga: A review
The comical Professor Anton Van Niekerk on video
Pity the video doesn’t exist anymore.
Nevertheless, another one of these self-loathing libtard academics who wanted “a wider apology and responsibility taken” for Apartheid was historian and Prof at Freestate University, Lindie Koorts.
Lindie Koorts: No shame, no remorse: How Afrikaners are dealing with their apartheid past
Koorts actually wrote quite a good biography of Dr. D.F. Malan, a man whose shoelaces she is not worthy of tying, but she seems disappointed in Afrikaners for not wanting to collectively apologize for “THEIR” Apartheid past.
Nah, ja…Historian she calls herself…
Maybe if she actually bothered to do some research or read My Book she would know that Apartheid started with the Dutch at the Cape when Van Riebeeck planted the first Bitter Almond hedge to separate the stealing Khoi-Khoi from the Dutch settlement and most of the Apartheid laws were already put in place by the British before the Afrikaners came to power in 1948. Where are the apologies from the Dutch and British governments for the role of the Dutch East India Company and the British East India Company in South Africa?
Where are their “wider apologies and responsibilities” for making, instituting and maintaining all the Apartheid laws for centuries before the Afrikaners came to power? Why only scapegoat the Afrikaners today for a 40-year period of continuation of laws they were mostly not even responsible for? Why do the British and Dutch people not show any shame and remorse? Why only look for shame and remorse before the door of the Afrikaners?
Besides, “Shame and Apology” for what? For taking white taxpayer’s money to uplift blacks? For building them schools, hospitals, universities, etc? For giving them employment?
Lindie Koort’s interpretation that all blacks suffered humiliation under white rule and all whites are guilty of Apartheid and that Apartheid was “bad” (therefore the guilt) for blacks smacks of subjective generalization, unbecoming of a distinguished academic and historian who should set an example of objectivity to her students.
The cardinal question none of these so-called academics ever ask is, "Why did Apartheid even exist?"
If we truly were all the same as these racial egalitarians and cultural relativists believe, claim and maintain, then there should never have been a need for Apartheid in the first place. Maybe they do not understand the principle of causality...of "cause and effect".
Maybe Apartheid was not the problem, nor a crime against humanity at all...Maybe it was the attempted ANSWER to a problem and real crimes against humanity...or have they not heard of Bloukrans yet?
But it was the other Auntie-with-a-20-year-old-profile-pic, Ferial Haffajee that got my attention, because of her reference to a film by her Daily Maverick colleague, Richard Poplak that will come out later this year.
Apparently, it is about the myth-making that De Klerk was a national hero. Now based on the current evidence I would rather say that this myth-making was a failure as far as De Klerk is concerned, but an astronomical success when it comes to the Dead Terrorist Nelson Mandela.
The upcoming film, “Influence”, by Daily Maverick’s Richard Poplak and Diana Neille reveals that the myth-making was the work of Lord Tim Bell, who later founded Bell Pottinger, and who claimed to the directors that he was paid by billionaire Johann Rupert to assist De Klerk. (Rupert has denied the allegations).
The late Lord Bell revealed in the film that he had created the idea of the liberator and boosted De Klerk’s image in order to win a greater slice of the vote for the National Party to ward off a landslide black majority election victory in 1994.
What they don't say is how they turned Nelson Mandela from a convicted terrorist to a god.
The end result was a monumental myth…a myth that is still believed by millions the world over. A myth that is taught in our schools and academic institutions. A myth that parents teach their kids today. A myth you see daily in newspapers and on television…
It is of course the myth that Apartheid was bad, that it was a genuine “crime against humanity” …The myth of Saint, Jesus, God Mandela…the myth of a Rainbow Nation Utopia.
Take a look around. Do you see a myth or do you see REALITY? At least now we know how this myth was created.
See... we, the unblinkered, red-pilled realists never swallowed this propaganda bollocks that Mandela was a heroic saint. We always knew he was a Marxist terrorist. We always knew De Klerk was a traitor and a sell-out. We never believed in the Rainbow Fairyland. We always knew there were sinister forces responsible for this myth-making, but for fear of being branded crackpot, conspiracy theorists we largely kept quiet.
But then Msholozi’s corrupt charros from the Sub-Continent and their Oakbay company hired the same sinister forces to further their agenda and turn against the so-called “White Monopoly Capital” that paid them before.
The fact that it led to more hatred, resentment and mistrust amongst the races of South Africa did not matter to them. Neither did the increase in black on white farm attacks and murders matter to them. It never did.
Nevertheless, it blew the truth wide open and led to the demise of Bell-Pottinger.
On 19 March 2017, the South African Sunday Times alleged that Bell Pottinger was behind a social media strategy, using a network of fake bloggers, commentators and Twitter users, in an attempt to influence public opinion, exacerbate racism, and sow racial division in South Africa, as well as targeting media and personalities that were opposed to the Gupta family, on their client's behalf.
Finally, the conspiracy theory proved to be conspiracy FACT and then some. It was far worse than we originally suspected. Now we know that Bell-Pottinger's boss admitted that they were active in South Africa, sowing racial discord, distrust and chaos for the last 30 years.
So, I am waiting with baited breath on the movie “Influence”. Time will tell if it is just more propaganda or what.
Conclusion
However, I am glad that F.W. upsetted the apple cart and caused a vigorous long overdue debate about what Apartheid really was in comparison with other ideologies and political systems of the time. It pales in comparison to the genuine atrocities and genocides of the world’s Communist regimes and even the atrocities of the angelic ANC.
But it is not enough. Hence the writing of My Book and why I named it "Opening Apartheid’s Pandora’s Box". I want more conflict like this. I want to see how deep the rabbit hole of Apartheid goes. I want the truth of the atrocities on BOTH sides, so we can objectively judge the past and move forward.
People always shy away from conflict…as if conflict is something bad. In fact, conflict per se is not necessarily bad. It depends on how you MANAGE conflict, because conflict can also be positive and productive. It can be an accelerant. It can lead to quicker solutions and if you look around you in the New (improved) South Africa…solutions are definitely what we need.