Challenging some popular theories on human migration

Out of Africa - The bullshit story we are all familiar with

By Mike Smith
23rd of May 2017

Debunking the “Out of Africa” Theory

Conventional theory is that Whites and Asians all originated from blacks of Africa and somehow managed to get their distinctive skin colours and eye features after they exited Africa.

How people can still believe this rubbish and teach it in the schools are beyond me.

An examination of over 5,000 teeth from early human ancestors shows that many of the first Europeans probably came from Asia, not from Africa.

Scientific American: Is the “Out of Africa theory” out?

Ötzi stumps out of Africa theory Bacteria found in the stomach of the famous 5,300 year old Ice Man shows that Whites could not have come from Africa.

Australian, Swedish, Russian, German and Danish studies all show that DNA evidence debunks the “Out of Africa” theory and that Homo Sapiens Sapiens ancestor probably comes from Australia.

See...Nobody can explain how Australian Aborigines, who had the most primitive of primitive tools 70,000 years ago could build boats in Africa that could cross hundreds of miles of ocean and how these people could navigate to Australia together with their dogs and on top of it leave all their African genes behind, because believe it or not, there is no African in Abo.

As early as a few decades ago the Australians didn’t even class Abo’s as humans. What changed? Libtard brainwashing and propaganda, is what happened.

As such, a very recent paper on Y-chromosomes released in 2012, (Re-Examing the “Out of Africa” Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasians) in the Light of DNA Genealogy written by Anatole A. Klyosov and Igor L. Rozhanski) only confirms the denial of any African ancestry in Australia, and strongly supports the existence of a “common ancestor” who “would not necessarily be in Africa. In fact, it was never proven that he lived in Africa.

Start of Quote:

“The researchers are adamant that their extensive study “offers evidence to re-examine the validity of the Out-of-Africa concept”. They see no genetic proof substantiating an African precedence in the Homo sapien tree, and maintain that “a more plausible interpretation might have been that both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient common ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork”.

End of quote:

You see? DNA evidence proves that Homo Kafricanus are a completely different species altogether.



Bantu Migration

But giving them the prefix of “Homo” is actually wrong.

Are they even human? Mrs Ples, and the Taung Child are Australipothecus africanus, a sub-species of Gorilla, not human.

Blacks are descendants from Australipothecus (aka Paranthropus) Robustus. Paranthropus in Greek means “Para” – Beside…..”Anthropos” – Human.

Paranthropus is associated with stone tools both in southern and eastern Africa. Hand fossils from Swartkrans, South Africa, indicate that the hand of Paranthropus robustus was adapted for precision grasping and tool use. Evidence from Swartkrans also shows that they used fire.

So what is next…are troops of chimps now going to come and lay claim to South Africa? Maybe if we make a baboon and his troop president he will do a better job than Zuma and the ANC. Definitely can't be worse.

Coin from Carthage

Then you get the Afrocentric idiots who want to say that General Hannibal Barca of Carthage was black or that the Egyptians were black. Of course utter rubbish. It is like saying General De La Rey was black because he came from Africa.



Another Carthage coin

Carthage was a Phoenician colony and the Phoenicians were WHITE. Just do a Google Image search on Phoenician and Carthage coins and see for yourself how these people looked like. Look at their sharp thin noses sticking out in front of their lips. With blacks the lips protrude out in front of the nose.



So where do whites come from?

Often Black South Africans tell white South Africans to go back to Europe but themselves do not want to go back to central Africa. Nevertheless there is a flaw in their reasoning.

Whites, Caucasians, Indo European, Indo-Germanic, whatever you want to call them are all Aryans from northern Iran area. There were two groups:

The settled ones were the Parthian Empire and the more nomadic ones were the Scythians



Who were these people?

We know a great deal about their physical appearance; they were long-headed giants (over two metres tall) with blond hair and blue eyes and recently, a large number of their mummified corpses were discovered in western China; these mummies, which are extremely well-preserved in the arid conditions of the Taklamakan desert, are now on display at the museums of Khotan, Urumchi, and Turfan in Sinkiang; they are dressed in
Scythian costume, i.e., leather tunic and trousers, and are usually displayed in the sitting position, exactly as described by Herodotus; what is extra ordinary apart from their northern European features, however, is their gigantic heights, well over two metres as they are now, in spite of the natural shrinkage expected during the past thousands of years.

Head of a blonde Scythian

Scythians were not just blood-thirsty barbarians (they used to drink the blood of their first victim on the battlefield and practiced scalping and decapitation of victims).

This can be seen in their elaborate golden artwork. Scythian gold came from the Altai district and from frequent raids on Greek and Persian cities. Gold was sewn into their garments in the form of plates, fashioned into belts, broaches, necklaces, torques, scabbards, helmets, earrings, and ornaments, and worked into their weapons. The Scythians had an eye for design, especially depictions of griffins, lions, wolves, stags, leopards, eagles and – the Scythians’ favourite motif – animals in deadly combat.

Scythian artwork



Mummy of a blonde haired Scythian chief with tattoos.

Herodotus testified that the Scythians wore tattoos as a sign of their nobility. A Scythian without tattoos showed that he was of low station. The existence of Scythian tattoos was confirmed in 1948, when a Russian archaeologist uncovered the frozen body of a Scythian chieftain.







Settling the Americas: The Bering Strait Crossing Theory vs Solutrean hypothesis



For decades, anthropologists had suggested that people entered North America from Siberia via the Bering land bridge, then spread south into the U.S. and Mexico via a corridor that opened up between the melting ice sheets in what is now Alberta and B.C. about 13,000 years ago.

At least this is the story I was told in school and what they still teach the kids today.

Debunking the Bering Straits Crossing Theory



Vine Deloria Jr.

The Native American Professor of Political Science Vine Deloria Jr who died in 2005 took apart the entire Bering Strait Hypothesis in his book Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact

Some of the evidence against it is the absence of historical record in American Indian folklore; the absence of significant numbers of artefacts on either side of the Strait; the fact that there was a giant ice barrier that isolated Alaska from the rest of North America during the last Ice Age; that there were mainly mountain ranges in the way, and it is very unrealistic to believe that the animals that supposedly migrated into North America from Asia would have bothered leaving their comfy homes and travelled across mountain ranges to live in a strange land with strange food; that the Bering Strait bridge would only have been possible if there was a drop of at least 200 feet of the world's sea level. Also, he points out an interesting fact - that only 2% of Eskimos live in Siberia, so it's more realistic to assume the Inuit travelled from East to West rather than from West to East.

Of course he was heavily criticised for his views...until evidence surfaced last year in May 2016.

A study was published in Science Advances Journal on May 13, 2016 Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas that debunked the Bering Strait hypothesis.

S. David Webb, a paleontologist then at the University of Florida and James Dunbar from Aucilla Research Institute found stone tools and mastodon bones together underwater in the Aucilla River near Tallahassee, and proved conclusively that “people butchered or scavenged a mastodon… at least 1,500 years earlier than previously suspected.” This discovery places ancient Indians in Florida before passage to the Americas from Asia through the Bering Land Bridge was ice-free.

The Solutrean Hypothesis

The Solutrean Hypothesis

The, Solutrean hypothesis first proposed in 1998 by Archaeologists Dennis Stanford of the Smithsonian Institution and Bruce Bradley of the University of Exeter, is a hypothesis about the settlement of the Americas that claims that people from Europe may have been among the earliest settlers of the Americas.

The Solutrean Culture was found in the area of modern day France and Spain about 20,000 years BC.

The reason for their Hypothesis is that the tools (including sewing needles with an eye and fishing hooks) as well as arrow and spear points (Clovis point) found amongst North American people resemble that of Europeans and not Asians. Lithic or stone tool antecedents of Clovis points have not been found in northeast Asia and no Clovis sites have been found in Alaska or Yukon.

The Solutrean Hypothesis contrasts with the mainstream archaeological orthodoxy that the North American continent was first populated by people from Asia, either by the Bering land bridge at least 13,500 years ago, or by maritime travel along the Pacific coast, or by both.

Clovis projectile tips

The Solutrean hypothesis builds on similarities between the Solutrean industry and the later Clovis culture / Clovis points of North America, and suggests that people with Solutrean tool-technology crossed the Ice Age Atlantic by moving along the pack ice edge, using survival skills similar to those of modern Eskimo people. The migrants arrived in northeastern North America and served as the donor culture for what eventually developed into Clovis tool-making technology.

Clovis points were first discovered near the city of Clovis, New Mexico, and have since been found over most of North America and as far south as Venezuela. Major sites are Anzick site ( Montana); the Blackwater Draw site (New Mexico); the Colby site (Wyoming); the Gault site (Texas); the Simon site (Idaho); the East Wenatchee Clovis Site (Washington); Clovis points have also been found northwest of Dallas, Texas. But as we have seen… No Clovis sites have been found in Alaska or Yukon.

New research sinks Bering Strait land bridge theory

Further… DNA evidence taken from pollen, plant and animal sources in the lakes in British Columbia and Alberta were consolidated in a new study by Danish, Canadian and American scientists and shows that migrating across the Bering Straits would have been impossible, as there wasn't enough food and vegetation growing in the ice free corridor to support humans until long after people were living south of the ice sheets.

CBCNews: Popular theory on how humans populated North America can't be right, study shows

Read the full study here: Nature article: Postglacial viability and colonization in North America’s ice-free corridor