By Mike Smith
10th of September 2016
I see a lot of right-thinking white South Africans criticizing liberals and blacks. For instance they complain about blacks to blacks and tell them they are useless, retarded, stinking, etc…but…What is the point? What do these whites actually hope to achieve?
Are they hoping blacks will improve? Are they hoping they will someday magically “come right” and become more like whites if they complain more to them?
At first such criticism and complaining would appear “racist”, but is it really? I mean it sounds a lot like what the liberals are trying to achieve by building schools, hospitals, etc for blacks.
At the end, in right and left, conservative and liberal thought the same faint hope of “improvement” can be detected; whether by education, money or insult, the goal is the same:
“If only they can be more like us, if only they can be educated to be more like us, everything will be OK and we will be able to live in peace together.”
This brings us to the contradiction and hypocrisy of the liberal who says that we are already all the same, but if we were, there would be no need to build schools and hospitals for blacks. There would be no need to throw money at them and educated them. Blacks would be able to do it all by themselves.
Whether they want to know it or not, the do-gooder-leftist, racial egalitarian and cultural relativist all have a definite and absolute starting point; We are not the same.
They then start to look for simplistic reasons WHY we are not the same and always seem to find the fault within themselves and other whites.
It is “US”. We, the whites, are the ones who enslaved blacks. We are the ones who colonized their lands. We are the ones who prevented them from evolving, getting educated, getting rich, etc, etc.
They also immediately block out any evidence to the contrary or evidence that in history whites were also enslaved by other whites, by blacks, by Arabs, etc. Whites also had their lands colonized by other whites, by the Mongols, the Tartars, the Huns, the Persians, the Arabs, etc.
Fact of the matter is that history shows that blacks were not the only victims and whites were not the only culprits.
However, the liberal mind is simplistic, weak and lazy. It doesn’t like to be exercised, nor challenged. It is constantly looking for the quickest simplest solution to its cognitive dissonance, but in doing so starts a downward spiral that leads to more contradiction, more dissonance and more hypocrisy.
The liberal suffers from reality blindness and truth deafness. When this is pointed out to him/her the hands are clasped over the ears or eyes and the head goes into the sand.
The result is that the liberal finds self-flagellation far easier than cognitive dissonance. Self-flagellation over the racial failure of blacks is at the same time the method and the symptom of a weak, simple and unthinking mind.
The liberal simply cannot see that if we were all indeed the same, we would all have had the same weapons, the same education, the same values, the same beliefs, etc and if we were all equally strong and intelligent, we would not have been able to conquer and enslave each other, neither would there have been any reason to do so and although all races were victims of colonization and slavery at one stage or another in history, the fact that one infantile race in particular, still sees itself in a liberated age as “eternally victimized”, “enslaved” and “colonized” and constantly bitch, moan, bellyache and gripe about it, shows its inferiority towards other races that do not do so.
In fact, conquest and colonization could be seen as liberating and progressive methods of the past that attempted to civilize and educate those who were not the same as us in order to make them “more like us”.
The trap that the recently enlightened and awoken right-thinker (REAART) often falls into is to think that he/she can somehow “cure” the unthinking liberal which leads to a contradiction in itself, because if he were really “enlightened” or “awoken” he would be able to see the folly of his ways and would not attempt to “cure” the liberal.
Likewise if the “liberal” was indeed capable of being “cured” he/she would have had the original mental capacity to be cured and would not have been a true liberal in the first place, but merely a sleeping, “not-yet-awoken” or “not-yet-enlightened” right-thinker.
Further, the REAART often enjoys holding up the mirror to blacks and pointing out their abominable culture, beliefs, superstitions and ways to them. The REAART might even insult their person or their cultural beliefs, but this is where the motive has to questioned, because what is the ultimate goal of it all? That they should “wake up” and become “more like us”?
The conclusion can only be that the REAART who does this and have as his/her motive the “wake up and become more like us” attitude is not yet fully “awoken” and “enlightened” and in fact still a liberal, for this is ultimately the same goal as the liberal who wants to “educate” and “uplift” the blacks i.e “become more like us”.
If the motive is to simply have fun and laugh at blacks and their ways, the REART is showing his simplistic and unthinking mind and is simply being silly for it would be akin to laughing at a snake for being a snake or a monkey for being a monkey. Blacks cannot help for what they are. They were simply born like that. Laughing at them is not going to turn them into anything else.
Some REAARTs might feel that their motives are to strengthen the camaraderie of the core or group of right-thinkers in order to prevent some from straying over to the dark side and at the same time attract others from the dark side, but if someone does go over to the dark side it is evidence that he/she was never one of us in the first place and would actually be doing us a favour to rid our gene pool of their defective genes.
Some REAARTs might feel that verbally attacking liberals and blacks is a method or tactic of self defence; a way of keeping them at bay, but this projects a certain innate fear of them being able to convince us, lead us astray or to kidnap us over to the dark side.
I must admit that even to the strongest of right-thinkers the urge to tell an annoying liberal or black to go away in an incestual, sexual manner sometimes become overwhelming, but truth is that the truly enlightened right-thinker is already covered by an impenetrable force field known as a “bullshit barrier” from which libtard and kaffir crap simply slides off.
In a perfect world the “truly enlightened and awoken right thinker” (TEAART) is simply a person at peace with himself to whom libtards and kaffirs become visually and audibly invisible; there is no need to attack or insult them. They simply are what they are and there is neither need nor point in trying to convince them, cure them or hold up a mirror to them. They simply do not exist in his world.
In a perfect world a blog like this would actually be superfluous.
“Enlightenment” on earth is not a goal, but rather a journey taken by the few. True enlightenment can only be reached by coming ever closer to God and this can ultimately only be reached through the inevitable death.
Therefore becoming a REAART is not the end of a journey, but rather the start. The road from REAART to TEAART is long, difficult, but at the same time also pleasurable. The point is to always know exactly where on this road one is and the further one is, the more the light of truth glares out the evil of the dark side and those in the black abyss of lies, hypocrisy and bullshit become invisible.
“There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death.” Proverbs: 14:12
“Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.“ John 13:7